| Home > Drawings Section |
 |
FILE 127/2352 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|
||
|
| Rate this file (Current rating : 1.2 / 5 with 19 votes) | |||||
| File information | |
| Filename: | dragon_017.jpg |
| Album name: | Admin / Drawings Section |
| Rating (19 votes): |   |
| Artist: | Macil |
| Date Received: | Received Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:09:18 EST |
| Filesize: | 171 KiB |
| Date added: | Jul 15, 2005 |
| Dimensions: | 1008 x 804 pixels |
| Displayed: | 1089 times |
| URL: | http://www.dragnix.net/Artistic_Section/Drawings/displayimage.php?pid=128 |
| Favorites: | Add to Favorites |
Comment 1 to 35 of 35 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
alrite....
|
|
|||
|
muppet dragon
|
|
|||
|
Brilliant work
|
|
|||
|
Awesome.
|
|
|||
|
"muppet dragon!" heh heh totally! -said with all due respect...I love this one too! Very different. Would like 2 invite the artist2 submit mayB the same dragon with less white on the page.I find,unless on a(usually darker) coloured backround, when looking at white areas on a drawing, our eyes get xtremely lazy&then never end up properly seeing the whole artwork. i find the eyes get impatient too when theres less shading, they hav2 strain harder coz(as we kno) white reflects,& black absorbes..wow im brilliant! & humble!
|
|
|||
|
i'm not sure i agree with that...
|
|
|||
|
this dragon almost reminds me Beaucephlis
|
|
|||
|
Alexader the Great's horse?
|
|
|||
|
No Beaucephalis the Gold-Star Dragon!!!
|
|
|||
|
Ano tir, Fanulios!
|
|
|||
|
????
|
|
|||
|
Look for the poem 'A Elbereth Gilthoniel.'
|
|
|||
|
o thats in the first book rite?
|
|
|||
|
I don't know which book that part's in, but the whole poem itself is in all three.
|
|
|||
|
all right, there are six books in three volumes, in case you didn't know. And there are two places in which there are hymns to Githoniel and Elbereth, in books 1 and 2, in the chapters Three is Company and Many Meetings. i believe the one you want is the second one. i don't remember any places in the other books.
|
|
|||
|
There are plenty more than six books, I am refering to the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, refered to in the titles as 'Being the first part..." "Being the second part..." and "being the third part of THE LORD OF THE RINGS."
|
|
|||
|
there is no Lord of the Rings Trilogy. if you read the note on the text at the beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring, Douglas Anderson addresses this misconception saying that it is INCORRECTLY called a trilogy. also, i know that Tolkien wrote more than six books, but in the LotR trilogy, so-called, there are only six books in three volumes, plus appendices.
|
|
|||
|
Indeed. But in the forward to those same three volumes, the forward by Tolkein, the three volumes are refered to as 'the first part,' 'the second part,' and 'the third part.' It is indeed a trilogy.
|
|
|||
|
hey did you know that there was a LOTR exhibition? I went to it, man it was awesome!!!
|
|
|||
|
Where?
|
|
|||
|
probably on the other side of the world to you
|
|
|||
|
Probably. Or at least no where close. So far the closest one on this site is Makla, and he's in another state...
|
|
|||
|
Oops none of you guys live in Boston. Do you?
|
|
|||
|
nope
|
|
|||
|
Well it was a traveling exhibit and one of it stops was boston. I got to hold Gandalf's sword!!!!
|
|
|||
|
OSUM PIC
|
|
|||
|
love it
|
|
|||
|
Gandalf's sword is so heavy!
|
|
|||
|
awsome so COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|||
|
it could do with a bit of shading then it would be REALLY REALLY COOL
|
|
|||
|
BRILLIANT!!!
|
|
|||
|
Wow! I like the detail. Your off to a really good start!
|
|
|||
|
all you need is to wrk on the head!
  
|
|
|||
|
agreeing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|||
|
tha wasnt me Aqa. . . .
|
Comment 1 to 35 of 35 Page: 1 |
